2013 Gnu Riders Choice C2BTX Snowboard Review

The Gnu Rider’s Choice is a higher end all mountain board. I know a few people who rave about this board so it will be good to finally try it out and see what all the hype is about.

2013 Gnu Riders Choice Pickle

2013 Gnu Riders Choice Pickle

Size: 157.5
Shape: true twin/asym twin shape, C2BTX; banana with camber & Magnetraction
Bindings: some crazy neon-leopard-printed Bent Metal bindings did the trick
Stats: Dave 6′ 210 lbs stance, Leo 5’9″ 180lbs stance at 23.5″ regs 18/-12 degrees

Conditions: hardpack, semi-firm groomers not a patch of ice to be found anywhere, well groomed boarder-x course, beginner park features about 30 degrees.

First impressions: It’s got hatchets on it.

Flex

Dave: The Gnu Rider’s choice is a relatively firm all-mountain board, consistent flex on the nose & tail, torsionally stiff enough to be ultra-responsive but not so stiff it’s like trying to steer a 2×4.

Leo: The Rider’s Choice was about mid-stiff throughout the length of the board. I was expecting it to be a little softer between the feet, but it wasn’t.  Don’t quote me on this, but I believe the GNU RC does not have carbon in the tips so that might be the reason why.  They use this “quasi glass” construction for its pop.  Torsionally, I found the RC to be a bit softer than it’s mid-stiff flex.

Ollie/Pop

Dave: The C2 shape consistently delivered loads of pop, absolutely no complaints this board surprised me here!

Leo: I agree with Dave on this.  Consistent pop either direction.  The camber underfoot allows you to preload so go about with your ollie shenanigans.

Playfulness

Dave: With a medium-firm flex the Rider’s Choice is definitely not the most playful board around. Although it’s still butter- and press-able advanced riders will get more “play” out of this board than novice/intermediates. The Rider’s Choice is really more at home outside the terrain park, rocks, pillows, stumps, natural terrain.

Leo: “Medium-firm” sounds like tofu Dave.  Is Tofu playful?  At any rate, the RC is not the most playful board on the block.  However, the previous RCs had varying flex depending on the size.  So the lower sizes will be more flexy if they keep with this tradition.  As for the 157.5 we demoed, I echo Dave’s thought that the RC is at home more with the all-mountain side of all-mountain freestyle.

Handling

Dave: The Rider’s Choice was very responsive, quick edge to edge transitions on the groomers, and held an excellent edge. Where sometimes the MTX is “grabby” it felt effortless on the Rider’s Choice and really let you lay in to drawn out carves. It is damp enough and stable enough to ride through even unforgiving terrain/conditions with confidence.

Leo: Phenomenal edge-to-edge.  Not sure where to give the credit here… quasi glass or the torsional give.  The RC was pretty stable although I found it to be a little noisy underfoot on longer drawn out carves.  Didn’t ever come close to washing out though thanks to the grippy Magnetraction. Stable without feeling dead as it’s actually pretty lively underfoot.  I just had a blast making turns on this thing.  The RC also features an Asymmetrical sidecut to give you more power on your heelside.  I always found this to be more marketing than anything.  Perhaps it’s because I always have a moderate forward lean on my bindings anyway.

Price: $520. If that doesn't burn a good hole in your wallet, then we just want you to know that we love gifts. Click on the "Buy Now" button to compare prices.

Summing it Up

Dave: The Rider’s Choice was a blast to ride and probably one of my favorite Mervin boards. Although it’s lacking a little bit for park/jib the Rider’s Choice is still pretty versatile and the sort of board that will grow with you as a rider. Intermediate riders can definitely progress on this board, and advanced riders should enjoy it’s all-mountain versatility.

Leo: This was my first time on the Rider’s Choice and I’ll have to say that it lived up to the hype (from co-workers).  Just a great stick to make turns on and to pop off anything in sight. Although I know fully well that I can’t unlock it’s full potential, it’s a board well-suited for someone like me who enjoys messing around on the whole mountain rather than spending my day in the park.  I have a feeling that you advanced all-mountain freestyle riders are going to love this board.  I’m thinking this is a baby T.Rice.
FacebookGoogle+TwitterRedditLinkedInEmail
6 Comments
  1. Pingback: GNU Riders Choice size - Snowboarding Forum - Snowboard Enthusiast Forums

  2. Hi, i know this is an old post but i’m considering this board (2013) and the agent rocker (2013). I know you guys have tested both boards, how would you compare them? I want it for all mountain riding, charge hard on groomers (frequently hardpack), jumps and little powder and buttering.

    I’m 5,83″ and 163lbs, and have offers for 155 or 157 on the agent and 157.5 on the riders choice. Btw, I’ve been snowboarding for 14 years now, i can say i’m an experienced rider (not that much when it comes to buttering and jumps and never do rails)

    Thank you and excuse my bad english.

    • These boards are both capable for the sort of riding you intend. I would recommend the Riders Choice, but it is very close, and given the sizes available for you, maybe the 155 Agent is the best option. The pure rocker shape on the Rome Agent will be a little bit better in powder. The magentraction edges and C2 shape will allow for better edge-hold & control on the hardpack conditions, although I thought that the Agent was very good at handling hardpack conditions. Both boards are medium-stiff, with the Riders Choice maybe a tiny bit softer. However, the 157.5 seems maybe too long for your size. If this is a size you are already comfortable with, then that might be OK, but otherwise I think the Agent in 155 might be best.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Connect with Facebook

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>